Saturday, September 05, 2009

Who Uses Greasemonkey?

As Johan and I begin to take over development of Greasemonkey, one of the important questions we need to answer is: which platforms should we support? We can inform this decision with some of the usage statistics that Mozilla Add-Ons gathers.

The statistics page for Greasemonkey is visible to everyone. The raw data is even available for download. But it can be hard to read, due to the level of detail and formatting that is applied. So, I've taken the time to analyze it carefully. The first interesting thing that we can see is the usage trends over time:

(Looks like Mozilla had a reporting issue around May of 2009.)

I've also made a pie-graph of app usage, for the average values of the past 4 weeks:

That pie chart represents these numbers:


So, let's say first off: we know this is a bad measurement. There's (almost) no "other" because there's no official support for other platforms, so only third party alterations make this usage possible. Thus, this data doesn't help us answer (i.e.) "Should we support Flock?" or "Should we support SongBird?".

It does let us know a little bit about what versions of Firefox we should support. All of 1.0 and 1.5 make up only 0.23% of the user base. Firefox 3.0 and 3.5 make up 95.44% of the user base. Firefox 2, however, makes up 4.31% of the user base. That's a much harder call.

Hackers: The raw data and charts behind this post is available on Google Docs. You can also see the python script that turned AMO's raw data into this presentation.


Gregor J. Rothfuss said...

There is no reason other than inertia to use Firefox 2.0. Greasemonkey is for power users who can be expected to upgrade.

avindra said...

"Greasemonkey is for power users who can be expected to upgrade."

Exactly my thoughts. Don't support older versions, I say. Focus on fixing all those bugs and requests instead.

Erik Vold said...

I say drop FF2 support, and we still cover ~95% of the users, and they still have older versions to use, that's a decent situation.

Anonymous said...

Hi, firefox recently updated and Grease Monkey will not load. Will there be an update soon?

Anonymous said...

latest version of gm is supported by latest version of ff

Anonymous said...

I absolutely love this tool,
but frankly, chrome is the way of the future.
Thanks for your work!

Does Extenze Work

Anonymous said...

I absolutely love this addon :)I've updated my firefox to the current 3.5.3 version but greasemonkey doesn't seem to work :( Am I missing something?

Anonymous said...

Incompatible Extension
Greasemonkey 0.8.20090123.1 could not be installed because it is not compatible with Firefox 3.5.3.

(this is the error I get. re above comment)

Anonymous said...

Could it be possible that User Agents Switching could possibly screw the results up?

Unknown said...

Some people pass the responsibility to expert writers because they miss the ability to compose a respectable paper about Greasemonkey in order that the reason why students need to use plagiarism detection, but such customers like writer don't do that. Thank you very much for the article

IchigoRadiance said...

Chrome will never be the future unless it implements an addon system, fixes it's tab system, stability issues, and makes a better theme system among others, but why wait on Chrome when we have a great browser already? Chrome may end up being the future, but not until it catches up to the present. Hey, at least it beats Internet Failsplorer.

UK Dissertation said...

Nice post! You have worked hard on jotting down the essential information. Keep sharing the good work in future too.

UK Dissertation

Unknown said...

Thank you a lot for this information, and looking forward to reading more in the future, as I have bookmarked your site, this post is really very informative. Thanks

Business Plan Service